Selection Criteria

Submissions will be judged based on how well they demonstrate the following:

BasicProficientAdvanced
Research Question, Research Plan, or Thesis StatementResearch question/plan or thesis statement is clear and identifies useful keywordsBasic + plan/question also accounts for scopeProficient + shows an interest in gaps in existing research and/or a re-examination
Search Strategy –Resource SelectionSources are found using research tools not specific or appropriate to the discipline/subjectSources are found using research tools appropriate to the discipline/subjectProficient + demonstrated creative/flexible use of research tools
Search Strategy – Search ProcessA non-iterative search process that relies almost exclusively on keyword searchesAn iterative search process that relies on keywords, subject terms, and search limitersProficient + evidence of critical thought about searching
Choice of SourcesChoice of sources has not been carefully considered. Appears to be driven by results lists or availabilityChoice of sources has been given careful considerationChoice of sources is thoughtful and representative of existing research on the topic
Evaluation of SourcesSources are related to the topic, but do not account for multiple perspectivesSources are related to the topic with some consideration for debate or differences of opinionSources represent an appropriate range of opinion and debate on the topic
Use of Sources in ContextSources are cited at appropriate points, but analysis and integration are lackingSources are cited at appropriate points and the sources are well-integrated (they are commented on or analyzed in context)Proficient + use of multiple sources and original argument in concert
Use of Sources in Context: Non-Traditional SourcesNon-traditional sources (open web sources, social media, etc.) are used where scholarship or books would have been more appropriateTraditional and non-traditional sources are used, though the process for inclusion is unclearTraditional and non-traditional sources are used in a creative and coherent way
Ethical Use of SourcesSources are cited, but often inconsistently or incorrectlySources are cited, but sometimes inconsistently or incorrectlySources are cited consistently and correctly
Overall Quality

Research lacks originality

Writing is unclear or difficult to follow. Errors are evident and frequent

Research represents a new approach to existing thought or work in the topic/subject

 

Writing is clear. Errors are minimal

 Research is an original contribution to the topic/subject

Writing is engaging. Errors are nearly nonexistent