Alfawzan, N., Christen, M. (2023). The future of FemTech ethics & privacy – a global perspective. BMC Medical Ethics, 24, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00976-z
Almeida, T., Shipp, L., et al. (2022, Oct. 8). Bodies like yours: Enquiring data privacy in FemTech. NordiCHI ’22 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 2022 Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference, Article 54, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3547522.354767
Amelang, K. (2022). (Not) safe to use: Insecurities in everyday data practices with period-tracking apps. In A. Hepp, J. Jarke, & L. Kramp. (Eds.), New perspectives in critical data studies. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96180-0_13
Balfour, L.A. (2023). FemTech: Intersectional interventions in women’s digital health. Palgrave Macmillan.
Carter, S.M., Rogers, W., et al. (2020, Feb.). The ethical, legal and social implications of using artificial intelligence systems in breast cancer care. The Breast, 49, 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.10.001
Chen, T. (2025). The new patriarchal digitality? Understanding gendered power dynamics through a systematic review of FemTech apps in China. Gender, Technology and Development, 29(2), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2025.2503561
Corbin, B. (2020). Digital micro-aggressions and discrimination: FemTech and the ‘othering’ of women. Nova Law Review, 44. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3630435
De Proost, M. (2025). Mobile health technology, empowerment, and self-respect: A feminist analysis. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 18(2), 294-315. https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab-2024-0019
Erickson, J., Yuzon, J.Y., & Bonaci, T. (2022). What you do not expect when you are expecting: Privacy analysis of FemTech. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 3(2), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2022.3160928
Facca, D., Hall, J., Teachman, G., Redden, J., & Donelle, L. (2025). FemTech and the paradoxes of empowerment: A critical conceptual (re)view. Women’s Reproductive Health, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2025.2589202
Figueroa, C.A., Sundqvist, J., Mathieu, S., et al. (2023). The opportunities and challenges of women’s digital health: A research agenda. Health Policy and Technology, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100814
Freeman, K., Geppert, J., Stinton, C., Todkill, D., et al. (2021). Use of artificial intelligence for image analysis in breast cancer screening programmes: Systematic review of test accuracy. BMJ, 374(1872). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1872
Gibson, A.F., Drysdale, K., Botfield, J., Mooney-Somers, J., et al. (2022). Navigating trans visibilities, trauma and trust in a new cervical screening clinic. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 24(10), 1366–1379. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2021.1952307
Hajkova, A., & Doyle, T.A. (2024). Hacking the cycle: FemTech, internalized surveillance, and productivity. Philosophy & Technology, 37, 123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00801-4
Hendl, T., & Jansky, B. (2022). Tales of self-empowerment through digital health technologies: A closer look at ‘FemTech.’ Review of Social Economy, 80(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2021.2018027
Jacobs, N., & Evers, J. (2023). Ethical perspectives on FemTech: Moving from concerns to capablity-sensitive designs. Bioethics, 37(5), 430-439. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13148
Krishnamurti, T., Birru Talabi, M., Callegari, L.S., Kazmerski, T.M., & Borrero, S. (2022). A framework for FemTech: Guiding principles for developing digital reproductive health tools in the United States. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.2196/36338
Lotz, M. (2021). Public funding of uterus transplantation: Deepening the socio-moral critique. Bioethics, 35(7), 664–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12914
McMillan, C. (2022). Monitoring female fertility through ‘FemTech’: The need for a whole-system approach to regulation. Medical Law Review, 30(3), 410-433. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwac006
Mohan, S., & Jenkins, J. (2025). Flowing data: Women’s views and experiences on privacy and data security when using menstrual cycle tracking apps. Oxford Open Digital Health, 3. https://doi.org/10.1093/oodh/oqaf011
Park, J.Y., Hsueth, S., et al. (2024, May 11). Critiquing menstrual pain technologies through the lens of feminist disability studies. CHI ’24: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Article 102, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.36426
Riley, S., Evans, A., & Robson, M. (2025). Postfeminist healthism: Understanding the gendering of healthism using menstrual tracking apps as an example. Sociology of Health & Illness, 47(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70116
Scatterday, A. (2022). This is no ovary-action: FemTech apps need stronger regulations to protect data and advance public health goals. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 23(3), 636-668. https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncjolt/vol23/iss3/6
Sergeant, A., Luigi-Bravo, G., Tam, G., & Gill, R. (2026). Safeguarding in FemTech: Protecting users of digital abortion tools in restrictive contexts. Contraception, 111397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2026.111397
Sillence, E., Osborne, A.K., Kemp, E., & McKellar, K. (2025). Menopause apps: Personal health tracking, empowerment and epistemic injustice. Digital Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251330782
Tuli, A., Singh, S., Narula, R., et al. (2022, Apr. 29). Rethinking menstrual trackers towards period-positive ecologies. CHI ’22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Article 283, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.351766
Tylstedt, B. (2026). ‘Good day for an ovulation test’: An autoethnographic exploration of the intimate frustrations of postdigital cycle-tracking. Postdigital Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-025-00616-2
Wilkinson, I., & Shipp, L. (2025). Queering FemTech: Understanding “queer use” in gendered technologies. IEEE Security & Privacy, 23(4), 60-70, https://doi.org/10.1109/MSEC.2025.3575607